Why Prices Drop at Launch: The Real Reason First Generic Entries Crush Premium Pricing

Why Prices Drop at Launch: The Real Reason First Generic Entries Crush Premium Pricing

Natasha F December 5 2025 3

When a new product hits the market, you’d expect it to cost the most. But that’s not what happens with first generic entries. Instead, the moment a competitor releases a cheaper version of something everyone thought was expensive, prices don’t just dip-they collapse. And it’s not just drugs. This same pattern shows up in software, electronics, and even cloud services. The question isn’t why prices drop-it’s why they drop so fast and so hard.

What Is a First Generic Entry?

A first generic entry is the very first time a competitor releases a functional copy of a product after its original patent or market exclusivity ends. In pharma, it’s when a drug company starts selling the same medicine as a brand-name pill but for a fraction of the cost. In software, it’s when a startup offers a database or CRM tool that does almost everything the big players do-but without the license fees.

The key isn’t just that it’s cheaper. It’s that it’s good enough. Most first generic products deliver 80-90% of the original’s features. For most users, that’s all they need. And when you realize you can get 90% of the power for 20% of the price, you don’t wait. You switch.

Why Prices Plummet Immediately

The price drop isn’t a mistake. It’s a strategy. Incumbents used to rely on scarcity. If you were the only company selling a certain drug or software, you could charge what you wanted. But once someone else enters the market with the same thing, that power vanishes.

Take the example of the Sony Bravia 4K TV from 2015. It launched at $1,799. Within a year, competitors flooded the market with similar models. By the end of the year, that same TV was selling for $899. Not because Sony gave up. Because they had to.

In pharmaceuticals, the data is even clearer. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the first generic version of a single-source drug cuts prices by an average of 76% within six months. Some drugs drop 90%. Why? Because once the patent expires, manufacturers don’t need to recoup billions in R&D. Their costs are mostly production and distribution. That’s it.

It’s Not Just About Cost-It’s About Trust

People assume generics are low quality. But that’s not true anymore. In 2022, a Reddit user wrote about switching from Oracle’s database to PostgreSQL. Their licensing costs dropped 78%. Performance? Identical. Downtime? Less. Support? Slower at first, but now they’re using community forums and paid consultants who know the system inside out.

G2, a software review site, found that first generic software tools hit 4.5 stars out of 5 within a year. Why? Because users aren’t buying based on brand. They’re buying based on value. The top reason? “I saved money without losing features.”

Even big companies like Microsoft noticed. When cloud-based alternatives started offering cheaper database services, Microsoft didn’t fight. They changed. In 2022, they rolled out consumption-based pricing for Azure SQL Database. Their effective price dropped 35% overnight. Why? Because they had to match the new reality.

Office workers celebrate as expensive software licenses burn, replaced by glowing open-source icons in a melting room.

How Generic Entry Changes the Game for Everyone

This isn’t just about price. It’s about control. For years, vendors held all the power. They set the rules, the contracts, the upgrade cycles. But when a $500 alternative shows up for a $10,000 product, customers start asking: “Why am I paying so much?”

Enterprises are now evaluating generic alternatives within three months of launch. In 2018, only 32% of Fortune 500 companies did this. By 2023, it was 67%. Why? Because IT budgets are tight. Gartner found 68% of CIOs are under pressure to cut costs. If you can replace a $50,000 license with a $10,000 one and get the same results, you don’t need approval from five layers of management. You just do it.

And it’s not just software. In electronics, commodity hardware and open-source platforms like Linux and Apache have cut production costs by 25-40%. That’s why you can now buy a digital music player for under $50-even though Apple’s first iPod cost $399 in 2001.

The Hidden Costs of Going Generic

It’s not all smooth sailing. Some users report 20-30% more setup time. Integration can be messy. Support isn’t always as fast. TrustRadius found 28% of early adopters ran into compatibility issues.

But here’s the thing: those problems are fixable. Most companies outsource the migration. Training takes 40-60 hours per admin-expensive, but still cheaper than annual license fees. And once the system’s running, 81% of users stick with it. Why? Because the savings keep coming.

The real cost isn’t the setup. It’s the cost of not switching. If you wait, you’re paying more than you need to. And by the time you decide to act, the price gap has already widened.

A dusty old iPod stands alone as hundreds of cheap music players zoom past on circuit board skateboards.

What’s Next? The Market Is Accelerating

The time between a product’s launch and its first generic copy used to be 18 months. Now it’s six. Why? Because tools are easier to copy. Cloud-native apps. Open-source code. AI-powered reverse engineering. The barriers are collapsing.

ARK Invest predicts open-source alternatives will capture 35% of enterprise software revenue by 2027. That’s not a guess. That’s a trajectory. Companies like MongoDB are winning not by being cheaper-they’re winning by offering a free tier with premium support. You start for free. If you like it, you pay for help. It’s a model that works.

PwC’s 2024 survey found 78% of software vendors are now testing usage-based pricing. That means you pay for what you use, not what you own. It’s the end of the license fee era.

What Should You Do?

If you’re a buyer: don’t wait for the big vendor to slash prices. Look for the first generic alternative. Check reviews on G2 or Capterra. Look for mentions of “cost savings” and “no license fees.” Ask about migration support. Most first-gen entrants offer it.

If you’re a vendor: accept that your pricing power is gone. Focus on service, support, and integration. Build ecosystems, not just products. Or you’ll become the $1,799 TV no one wants anymore.

The first generic entry isn’t a threat. It’s a signal. The market has spoken. You don’t have to be the cheapest. But you can’t keep charging like you’re the only one who matters.

3 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    Nigel ntini

    December 7, 2025 AT 12:05

    It's wild how fast the market shifts once the patent expires. I've seen it in pharma, in software, even in cloud hosting. The incumbents think they're untouchable until someone builds a better, cheaper wheel-and then everyone just walks away. No drama, no fanfare. Just quiet, mass migration. The real lesson? Value beats branding every time.

    And honestly? It's good for consumers. We win. The only ones who lose are the ones who refuse to adapt.

  • Image placeholder

    Priya Ranjan

    December 9, 2025 AT 02:53

    People still don’t get it. This isn’t innovation-it’s theft. Companies spend billions developing these products, and then some low-cost manufacturer copies them and calls it ‘good enough.’ That’s not progress. That’s exploitation. And now we’re rewarding it with applause? Pathetic.

  • Image placeholder

    Gwyneth Agnes

    December 9, 2025 AT 22:49

    Price collapse is inevitable. Stop pretending it’s not.

Write a comment